home

Welcome

FaithFusion offers blogs and columns on many topics: storytelling, society and culture, philosophy, religion, politics, science, and especially “deep doctrine magic” about all seven.

 

Features

 



Tags

 

Archives

 



 

Search

 



Updates



Follow me on Twitter
 



Recently read:
Nonfiction















 


Recently read:
Fiction







 



Heaven and Earth, part 1 — Fixing our eyes away from the lies

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 06:37 PM ET , Monday, Apr 13, 2009

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Heaven



Easter / Resurrection Sunday has come and gone, leaving Christ-followers around the world even more grateful for Christ’s resurrection and the hope of our own — but this weekend I realized even more that some ideas about how God will rise His people again to live everlasting need to be put to death and never brought back to life.

And then we ought also to dance with joy on the graves of such myths!

My thoughts came from yesterday, when I was told that a family I knew was saying goodbye to visiting relatives. Some voiced wishes that they could have more time to talk and visit. Well, at least we’ll have time in Heaven, one family member said.

But then another responded with something like, Oh well, we may not remember, you know.

Hearing about this expression of such a belief made me feel almost as grieved and disappointed as those who hold such ideas would feel, if they truly allowed themselves to consider. What a hopeless notion — Heaven, a world of perpetual “spiritoid” Alzheimer’s patients?

Some months ago, as part of an online discussion about the true nature of Heaven — the New Heavens and New Earth that God promises to createa friend of mine said (slightly edited):

I was watching a movie the other night, with my dad, and the main character was sitting in a lovely grove of tree, and it looked so beautiful, and I looked to my dad and asked him, “Dad, do you think they’ll be places like that in heaven?”

He replied, “Hmm, I think so.”

It worries me that he didn’t say with certainty, “YES!”

I remember picking peaches one time, and it was so beautiful in that grove of trees, eating fruit from the trees. I was enjoying myself so much, that I thought, “I hope heaven is like this.”

When I mentioned it to my grandma, she replied. “Like what?”

“Just like this, with the sun and the trees, and the birds singing.”

“Don’t be silly,” was her response.

Why is this thought of as wrong, or at least silly? Why do so many Christians believe such things about Heaven, or their resurrection bodies? Where are such notions found in Scripture? How could such a strange environment, in which it is assumed God’s people will be even less knowledgeable than they are now, be properly classified as Heaven? And how could such an existence be better without such simple gifts from God as His creation of nature?

Unlike other false views contrary to Scripture, myths about Heaven are far more harmful both to how we view our own resurrection and how we view God’s glory and Christ’s resurrection. Is God truly glorified by rescuing His bride from a universe beyond repair, and turning His people into “spiritoids” floating in some kind of ethereal world? Does Scripture really tell us this?

And unlike how many Christians handle some false views, I approach this with far more earnestness and heartfelt passion to show what Scripture says so clearly and in contrast. This isn’t to be right, or even to Stand on the Word just to look cool. And this is not about proving some peripheral point or “accessory” belief, either, such as end-times events or even political positions. This is vital — so vital to our hope for God’s after-world, and for our rejoicing in how He will make all things new!




Clouded criticisms keep harping on Heaven

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 11:42 AM ET , Friday, Jul 25, 2008

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Rebuttals, Deep Doctrine Magic: Heaven



Heaven — that is, anticipating the New Heavens and New Earth — is one of my favorite topics to discuss, both here and elsewhere. Recently I returned to another NarniaWeb forum discussion about the subject, and found a lengthier post of mine from June 22 that seems self-contained.

So here it is, with only a little editing for formatting and clarity. It starts out in response to another member’s contention that it seems stereotypical to act as though some Christians really do believe Heaven, nor or future, will be a silly and cartoon-esque fantasyland with clouds, harps and rainbows and things. Well, I hadn’t thought of that before! Is it the case that even some Christians really do accept this image as that of Heaven?


(A very small part of) Heaven (artist's conception)

col.klink wrote:

I keep hearing Christians and [“Heaven” author] Randy Alcorn complaining about how many people think is a place with lots of clouds were everybody has wings and plays harps. Does anybody actually believe that? Are people really that stupid?

[. . .] I’m disturbed when people say Christians believe that and teach it to children.

I don’t know of anyone who takes that description literally — even “fundamentalist” Christians aren’t nearly that silly. Instead, it’s mostly the idea of being “absorbed into God” or floating around in some kind of super-spiritual, nonmaterial, timeless state of being, that’s often advocated, or at least perceived in the back of Christians’ minds.

Take, for example, the following really-spiritual-sounding-but-un-Biblical statements:

  • There will be no time in Heaven.

  • In Heaven, everything will be made plain to us and our spiritual eyes will be opened instantly.

  • Heaven will be totally unlike anything we’ve ever imagined, but somehow we’ll really like it anyway.

These elements are directly cited in many Christian books about Heaven. Alcorn, for example, cites dozens of excerpts from titles, and then — easily — shows from Scripture how false they are, mostly based on the false presumption that the current Heaven — the place believers go when they die — is the same as the future Heaven; some theologians, trying to be all “spiritual” and not knowing it, just bypass the whole New Earth part.




Free 'salary' of salvation, but 'heavenly rewards' as commission?

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 12:25 PM ET , Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Media: Books, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Cross Firings, Heaven

Heaven Recommended
Heaven
by Randy C. Alcorn


The ongoing discussion On Christianity, in NarniaWeb’s Spare Oom forum, has led to a focus on the location where Christ-followers will be spending much more time than they will on this Earth.

I’ve posted many excerpts from Randy Alcorn’s Heaven — a fantastic work of nonfiction, readable and yet in-depth — along with many of my own suppositions and speculations about Heaven. As I’ve said before, when you clear away all the myth-conceptions (among them the idea that “we can’t even begin to imagine what Heaven will be like,” based on a misreading of 1 Corinthians 2:9), all kinds of possibilities open up.

More recently, though, a subtopic appeared in real life, when yesterday, the pastor of the small startup church I’ve been attending, preached on 1 Corinthians 3: 10-15.

That’s the passage that is about How We Should Work For Heavenly Rewards. Or is it? I’m not sure exactly, and I’ll explain why in a moment.

His message contained pretty much the basic idea of Heavenly Rewards, which goes something like this:

1. Yes, salvation is absolutely free, through Grace.
2. We can do nothing to earn Christ’s instant justification, or the Spirit’s progressive sanctification.
3. However, Heavenly rewards are based on works.
4. More works = more rewards. Good.
5. Sit around, with fewer works = less rewards. Not so good.
6. Might want to get to work, then.

It all sounds somewhat — non-Reformed to me. Basically it’s identical to a works-based view of not salvation, but sanctification.

Of course, we are to “work out our own salvation” as James (I think) says, but one must be careful not to swerve to either extreme: thinking that either sanctification is all up to God or it’s all up to the Christian.

Legalism isn’t only defined by works = salvation, it can also be grace = salvation, but salvation + works = even better salvation. The latter is far more insidious.

Won’t this understanding of Eternal Rewards lead to the idea that more works will lead to better salvation? and that while Eternal Rewards may result, that may also mean you could consider yourself spiritually better than those Christians who don’t or won’t do as many works?

Firstly, I’m not all that convinced that is the full context of the passage. Paul is talking about his laying down the foundation for the church in that chapter. Ergo, the meaning of “if anyone builds on the foundation” may not only refer to specific believers and their good works as the foundation, but the building construction of the church collectively.

Now, I don’t wish to commit the sin of eisegesis, reading my own perspectives into the text. Because a plain reading of the text might seem to indicate the existence of Heavenly Rewards.

However, it still sounds quite works-based! — that of course, imputed righteousness may be a Christian’s automatic salary, but God pays extra commission for good works.

The pastor went so far as to say that if we show up in Heaven with less works, we’ll be quite disappointed.

This I find quite extra-Biblical — if not un-Biblical entirely. Does that mean that Jim Elliot, murdered by Aucan South Americans, would somehow be “superior” in Heaven and feel quite satisfied with his Earthly accomplishments and consequential rewards, while Joe Schmoe, the wrecked trucker who “prays the prayer” right before his head went through the windshield, would show up and be tearful because — well, because what? Because he didn’t do enough “works” to merit rewards?

No. I submit that even if you have less “rewards” or works-commission in Heaven, you’ll be quite fine with that. If God truly is sovereign, who is to blame if you’re Joe Schmoe and show up in Heaven minutes after the trucking accident without much to show for a long Christian life? It is God who decided the moment of salvation — Joe’s late arrival in the Kingdom would thus be God’s “fault.”

So, methinks that despite Joe’s lack of works-commission, he’ll be quite happy to be in the intermediate Heaven and perfectly fine with any role God will have planned for him in the future New Earth.

Clearly, Heaven — the future New Heaven, when it’s merged with the New Earth — will contain a hierarchy of sorts. The apostles will play key roles, as will the Old Testament “saints” including Abraham, Moses, King David and so on. Your standard believers will have different roles to play, perhaps “subordinate” within some kind of government and variable stewardships. As with a marriage, of course, and with the two Persons of the Trinity Themselves, “subordinate” doesn’t mean “inferior,” just a different role.

So though everyone in Heaven is “created equal,” people will have different roles to play. Do they “rotate” stewardships? Or work their way up some spiritual “corporate ladder”? We don’t know. But as far as I’ve seen, nowhere in Scripture are we given the idea that people will show up in Heaven disappointed about what they’ve found there.



Book excerpt: 'Heaven' by Randy Alcorn

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 12:23 PM ET , Monday, Oct 02, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Media: Books, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Heaven

Heaven Recommended
Heaven
by Randy C. Alcorn


This will bend your head a little — I first posted this portion from page 374 in this Narnia and Christianity forum topic on NarniaWeb, Talking Beasts and Souls.

Stand by for awesomely Deeper Theological Magic from Before the Dawn of Time! ... :

Do Animals Have Souls?

When God made the animals, he made “the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good” (Genesis 1:25 [NIV]). Animals were important in Eden; therefore, unless there's revelation to the contrary, the principle of continuity suggests that they'll be important on the New Earth.

Like humans, animals were formed from the ground. “Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air” (Genesis 2:19). When God breathed a spirit into Adam's body, made from the earth, Adam became nephesh, a “living being” or “soul” (Genesis 2:7). Remarkably, the same Hebrew word, nephesh, is used for animals and for people. We are specifically told that not only people, but animals have “the breath of life” in them (Genesis 1:30; 2:7; 6:17; 7:15, 22). God hand-made animals, linking them both to the earth and humanity.

Am I suggesting animals have souls? Certainly they do not have human souls. Animals aren't created in God's image, and they aren't equal to humans in any sense. Nonetheless, there's a strong biblical case for animals having non-human souls. I didn't take this seriously until I studied the usage of the Hebrew and Greek words nephesh and psyche, often translated “soul” when referring to humans. (Nephesh is translated psyche in the Septuagint.) The fact that these words are often used of animals is compelling evidence that they have non-human souls. That's what most Christians in the past believed. In their book Beyond Death, Gary Habermas and J.P. Moreland point out, “It was't until the advent of seventeenth-century Enlightenment . . . that the existence of animal souls was even questioned in Western civilization. Throughout the history of the church, the classic understanding of living things has included the doctrine that animals, as well as humans, have souls.”

I cannot emphasize strongly enough that humans and animals are different. Humans continue to exist after death, but that may not be the case for animals. However, to do justice to Scripture, we need to recognize that people and animals share something unique: They are living beings. Because God has a future plan for both mankind and Earth, it strongly suggests that he has a future plan for animals as well.

Alcorn, Randy, Heaven (Carol Stream, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers, 2004), 374.




Boldly going into further geek-worlds

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 11:07 PM ET , Thursday, Aug 03, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Media: Film and DVD, Deep Doctrine Magic: Heaven, Life Applications



Where has Star Trek been all my life? Always in existence, at least since 1966 in its most primitive form, but only recently — I must admit — have I begun exploring the vast reaches of this creative galaxy myself.

Last year, I just happened to view what many fans consider the all-time best Star Trek: The Next Generation installments on television: the two-part “Best of Both Worlds” episode. In this epic story, the evil Borg, the now-infamous empire of ultra-collectivist alien life forms, attempts to assimilate U.S.S. Enterprise Captain Jean-Luc Picard and use his knowledge of humanity to invade Earth itself.

As an attempting author of a sci-fi like novel myself, I am gratified not to have viewed any of this series until now, after the entire project is nearly complete and sequel plans in the works. And I'm content that my work bears very little similarity to Star Trek — except, of course, regarding the most basic elements of space travel and advanced technology.

Tonight, though, my own warp factor increases beyond Next Generation repeats and into first-time viewings of the four Trek feature films with the Next Generation crew, starting with Star Trek: Generations.



I won't write a full review — it's an old film, after all. Yet that didn't hamper the visual effects, I noticed, which to me seemed completely on par with anything modern-day effects artists are capable of rendering. Meanwhile, the plotting, characterization and pacing were very well-done — though it is quite sobering to see the U.S.S. Enterprise D crash-landing into the surface of a planet. ...

No more spoilers will be given here, for those of you who haven't seen it. (You may now count yourselves as one less in number.) The heaven-like “Nexus” zone and the philosophy surrounding it was quite thought-provoking. This fantastic, mobile space “energy ribbon” is like Heaven, of course, in its eternal-like state of bliss — yet both Picard and Kirk realize that nothing done in this false-heaven is worth anything. It's all completely un-substantive.

But although the Trek philosophy bypasses the very real Heaven that awaits certain people after death, that in no way discounts the hints of such an existence during the scenes in which Picard is interwoven with the Nexus. And I found it incredibly interesting — “Intriguing,” as Data might say — that the epitome of a joyous existence, as portrayed by the film, is to be settled down with a loving, beautiful wife, a house at Christmas and a large family of half a dozen children. Is this not the very lifestyle that popular culture rejects as antiquated and strictly optional for men and women?



Another Biblical out-of-context text, nixed!

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 09:12 AM ET , Thursday, Jul 20, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Cross Firings, Heaven, Life Applications, Media: Books

Heaven Recommended
Heaven
by Randy C. Alcorn


The next time you hear someone say, “We can't begin to imagine what Heaven will be like,” you'll be able to tell them, “I can.”

-- from the back cover of Heaven by Randy Alcorn

In setting the stage for a deep theology of Heaven, then further thrilling studies — and some conjecture — about what it will be like in this incredible realm, Alcorn realizes many will think, Well, what about 1 Corinthians 2:9?

[A]s it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

1 Corinthians 2:9 (NIV)

For this, Alcorn highly recommends reading on to verse 10:

— but God has revealed it to us by his Spirit.

1 Corinthians 2:10 (NIV)

It seems the ESV translates it more effectively:

[A]s it is written,

“What no eye has seen, nor ear heard,
nor the heart of man imagined,
what God has prepared for those who love him”--

these things God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God. For who knows a person's thoughts except the spirit of that person, which is in him? So also no one comprehends the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might understand the things freely given us by God. And we impart this in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who are spiritual.

1 Corinthians 2: 9-13 (ESV)

“The context makes it clear that this revelation is God's Word (v. 13), which tells us what God has prepared for us,” Alcorn writes (page 19). “After reading a few dozen books about Heaven, I came to instinctively cringe whenever I saw 1 Corinthians 2:9. It's a wonderful verse; it's just that it's nearly always misused. It says precisely the opposite of what it's cited to prove!”

Another highly popular Biblical myth-conception, debunked — I just love it when that happens. Clearly, Heaven will imbue things that are wildly beyond our imaginations, but that doesn't at all mean it will be so otherworldly that it resembles nothing on Earth. Satan wants to get us thinking that way about death, Alcorn writes — so much so that even many Christians are either fearful about or bored with the idea of the splendors of the after-world!