home

Welcome

FaithFusion offers blogs and columns on many topics: storytelling, society and culture, philosophy, religion, politics, science, and especially “deep doctrine magic” about all seven.

 

Features

 



Tags

 

Archives

 



 

Search

 



Updates



Follow me on Twitter
 



Recently read:
Nonfiction















 


Recently read:
Fiction







 



Exploring The Last Battle’s Emeth element

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 05:38 PM ET , Monday, May 11, 2009

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Media: "Narnia: AWAKE", Books, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Christian Novels



Every once in a while I catch myself having oddball thoughts about either The Chronicles of Narnia or their author, C.S. Lewis. Such notions as these come not from any logical basis, but a rather reflexive attitude toward something like the Chronicles or Lewis’s other works, including Mere Christianity and The Great Divorce, that have proven to be so awesome yet so popular:

How could anything be so awesome and yet so popular at the same time? There must be Something Wrong with it. Something about Narnia or Lewis’s nonfiction is actually un-Biblical and that’s why people like it so much. After all, Biblical things aren’t supposed to be popular.

I think that subconscious suspicion may be behind how many people react to a certain controversial portion of Lewis’s last Chronicle of Narnia, The Last Battle. This has often come up in the Narnia and Christianity section of the NarniaWeb forum (where I’m a moderator). People worry about it: Lewis’s portrayal of a young and “pagan” Calormene man who somehow finds his way into Aslan’s (the Chronicles’ Christ-figure’s) country and the heavenly New Narnia.

Just this weekend, “Rilian” (NarniaWeb’s “podcasting prince”) and I recorded an hour-long session for the site in which we discussed what I’ve come to call The Emeth Element. It was an excellent interchange; I learned a lot, and I look forward to listeners’ responses!

We began with reading excerpts from The Last Battle itself, in which the character Emeth, a young man who had earlier been showed as being fully devoted to the false god — though very real and evil entity — Tash. Calling the bluff of a deception coordinated by Narnia’s false prophet Shift, and the evil Calormene, Rishda Tarkaan, Emeth enters the mysterious Stable, slays an enemy, and finds himself not in a small dirty wooden hut, but a wondrous paradise that (somehow) Aslan has set up and which can be entered by passing through the Stable door.

Later, Emeth tells other humans — the Seven Friends of Narnia — how he encountered Aslan.

“Then I fell at [Aslan’s] feet and thought, Surely this is the hour of death, for the Lion (who is worthy of all honour) will know that I have served Tash all my days and not him. Nevertheless, it is better to see the Lion and die than to be Tisroc of the world and live and not to have seen him. But the Glorious One bent down his golden head and touched my forehead with his tongue and said, ‘Son, thou art welcome.’ But I said, ‘Alas, Lord, I am no son of thine but the servant of Tash.’ He answered, ‘Child, all the service thou hast done to Tash, I account as service done to me. Then by reasons of my great desire for wisdom and understanding, I overcame my fear and questioned the Glorious One and said, Lord, is it then true, as the Ape said, that thou and Tash are one? The Lion growled so that the earth shook (but his wrath was not against me) and said, It is false. Not because he and I are one, but because we are opposites, I take to me the services which thou hast done to him. For I and he are of such different kinds that no service which is vile can be done to me, and none which is not vile can be done to him. Therefore, if any man swear by Tash and keep his oath for the oath’s sake, it is by me that he has truly sworn, though he know it not, and it is I who reward him. And if any man do a cruelty in my name, then, though he says the name Aslan, it is Tash whom he serves and by Tash his deed is accepted. Dost thou understand, Child?’ I said, ‘Lord, thou knowest how much I understand.’ But I said also (for the truth constrained me), ‘Yet I have been seeking Tash all my days.’ ‘Beloved,’ said the Glorious One, ‘unless thy desire had been for me thou wouldst not have sought so long and so truly. For all find what they truly seek.’

“Then he breathed upon me and took away the trembling from my limbs and caused me to stand upon my feet. And after that, he said not much, but that we should meet again, and I must go further up and further in. Then he turned him about in a storm and flurry of gold and was gone suddenly.”




‘I do not like that Shack of Mack!’

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 11:57 AM ET , Wednesday, Feb 04, 2009

Permalink
Categories: Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels, Cross Firings, Divergent Church, Media: Books



I have read the Shack of Mack.
I have read this paperback.
I would not give it to my friends.
I might just spoil how it ends.

[. . .]

That Mack in Shack!
That Mack in Shack!
I do not like that Mack in Shack!

So continues a “Kids-Book Author”-style review of the runaway bestseller The Shack by blogger Fred Sanders — and by “runaway” I mean both in the book's sales and by its distance from orthodox Biblical truth.

It seems Sanders is also the author of four other forms of Shack reviews, from categories such as “The Naïve Believer,” “The Worried Theologian” and perhaps the most interesting — I think, along with Tim Challies — a review from “The Literary Snob.”

But I must be a snob, too, because I find myself unable to react in any other way to this terrible writing.

Instead of writing like his favorite authors, though, he simply asserts in his own sentences the effects that their writing has on him. The result is oppressive, as in the description of a tree that the character Mack crashes into: As he lies prone and looks up into the tree, it is said “to stand over him with a smug look mixed with disgust and not a little disappointment.” Take a moment right now, reader, to see if you can arrange your face into an expression that communicates smugness mixed with disgust and disappointment. You will find it “not a little” impossible, and you have greater expressive range than trees. This is typical of the way Young projects attitudes rather than actually describing anything.

[. . .]

Whatever religious readers may make of the theological Trinity in this book, the most heretical trinity is surely this trinity of the Foreword and the first chapter, wherein three personas speak to us in a single confused voice, crying out with a shrill faux-folksiness, “Please like me! Please like me! I’m ever so authentic!”

[. . .]

And the clichés became flesh, and they dwelt in the shack. Throughout this section, the worst narrative passages sound something like “By the time Mack woke up, Jesus already had the waffles a-cookin’, and the Holy Ghost had cracked a couple eggs.” That is not an actual quotation, but here is one: Papa, the woman who portrays God the Father, reflects on her tendency to love everybody by saying, “”Guess that’s jes’ the way I is.” And before the reader can finish rubbing his eyes in disbelief, three lines later Papa says “Sho’ nuff!” Though he comes perilously close, Young at least manages to keep his God character from saying “I don’t know nothin’ ’bout rulin’ no universe!”

Perhaps I really need to read this book at last, if for no other reason that the comic impact in both substance and style! After all, years ago one of the worst books I ever read proved to be the best in helping me learn what good writing does not include. (It was an end-times paperback called The Third Millennium that made the worst books of the Left Behind series look like Jane Eyre in terms of literary quality.)

(By the way, yes, it is legitimate to point out others' criticisms of a book I have not personally read — see, for instance, the third of four pieces I wrote about that last summer.)

Finally, the best of Sanders' fifth and last review form, “The Haiku Artist,” is probably the first and last three lines:

Eugene Peterson
Said it was good as Bunyan.
He must have meant Paul.

[. . .]

My copy was free
But I almost lost my mind
Inside of the Shack.




New on Speculative Faith: Christianity, art and aliens

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 05:37 PM ET , Thursday, Jan 15, 2009

Permalink
Categories: Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Christian Novels, Storytelling





With the arrival of the new year, I've not only been writing more here (and working on other improvements to the site), but have also resumed contributing to Speculative Faith.

Today I finished and posted my second column in as many weeks. But my first column of 2009 was actually unfinished business from last year, when I had posted two installment to a three-part series about purity and Christian art — including speculative novels and movies. ...

The obscurity of ‘purity’ and Christ-honoring art, part III

“I hope to finish this series by outlining some Biblically based starter concepts, as best I can, next week.” That’s what I said more than three months ago. But I haven’t posted a thing to Speculative Faith at all in between, and that just makes me feel annoyed with myself.

But I suppose I can be glad for the delay. Maybe I can write more effectively about this issue now than I could have before!

My first part of the series dealt with the view that seems the least popular in American Christendom: the legalistic idea that Christians should avoid “bad” stuff and think only about wholesome and inoffensive things. I say that’s the least popular view, given the state of the western Church nowadays, and I kind of cheated writing about it because taking a stand against legalism is very popular (and, dare I say, too easy).

But as I wrote in part 2, some professing Christians head to the opposite extreme: the idea that media choices can’t really affect us, so we can exposure ourselves to all the R-rated crap we like. After all, to think otherwise would be Legalistic, and we don’t want to be like that, right?

In response, I’m offering (Lord willing) a more Biblically balanced view. In the last column, I touched on many Scriptures relating to what we put into our minds and suggested that the Apostle Paul didn’t suggest Christians avoid exposure to all kinds of evil, such as violence or curse words, because they would hurt us or allow the Devil to have “footholds.” Instead, he asked, Would whatever it is glorify God? And he did have a lot to say about avoiding sexual immorality in particular — which is one of the easier sins by which to be tempted in media.

Now I hope to continue this concept, and outline ways this especially affects writers and readers/viewers of the speculative faith-fiction genres.

Click here to read the full column. ...


Also, posted today, a summary of the what-does-the-Bible-say-about-aliens issue, based partly on my recent re-reading of Gary Bates' Alien Intrusion.

Are extraterrestrials and extra-fast travels alien to Christianity?

As I’ve planned, my hope this week is not so much to write a giant essay or series of essays, as I’ve done during the past year. Instead, I’d like to start conversations with a question — and gradually let my own views on the topic be revealed, and perhaps developed, in the comments.

So my question for this week is this:

Are extraterrestrials and extra-fast travels alien to Christianity?

This has been a hot topic in Christendom for years, and it especially related to how Christians approach science fiction, whether enjoying futuristic stories, or creating them.

Most of the Christian sci-fi stories I’ve seen either focus on Earth only. Or they’re set in Star Wars-like parallel universes in which Earth and Earthlings are nowhere to be found and God and Christianity exist in symbolic form — such as in Kathy Tyers’ Firebird trilogy.

Some end-times thrillers acknowledge alien activities, only to have it be revealed (shockingly!) that these things are actually demonic in origin (a plausible view that I share, but I don’t think it’s that shocking a conclusion anymore).

Only one Christian-published book I’ve read so far — John Olson’s and Randall Ingermanson’s The Fifth Man — includes the finding of extra-terrestrial life, though in keeping with both less controversial theology and more realistic science, the discovery is that of microbes, not some kind of humanoid civilization.

(By the way, I had thought to address this topic even before the London Sun said today that NASA scientists would unveil the news of evidence for living Martian microbes. …)

... And again, the complete column is available here, on Speculative Faith.




The obscurity of ‘purity’ and Christ-honoring art, part II

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 04:09 PM ET , Thursday, Sep 04, 2008

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Rebuttals, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Christian Novels, Life Applications



(As I did last week, I've also posted this part-two-of-three column to Speculative Faith today.)



Last week’s column, the first in this three-part series, began with a rebuttal to the pervasive notion among some Christians (both real and merely professing) that Christians are meant to avoid exposure to any type of evil, whether real or represented.

To that we find several objections, backed solidly by Scripture itself. Verses such as Philippians 4:8 never encourage Christ-followers to think about only nice things. The Bible itself often represents rebellion in much of its rot-gut disgustingness. The Gospel narrative itself comprises dark and bloody elements. And lastly, Christians were never taught to avoid the world and all its cultural products by the Apostle Paul, who illustrated the point with both words and by example. One of those examples is the below verse:

“All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be enslaved by anything.

1 Corinthians 6:12 (ESV)

Here, Paul quotes what was apparently a Corinthian proverb, and this instance, qualifies it with the Christian view. “All things are lawful,” the Corinthians apparently liked saying, but Paul goes on to say: Yes, but not all is beneficial. What is the point of doing “all things” if they only enslave you? The Apostle doesn’t even use the it’s-just-wrong-or-could-tempt-you-toward-evil argument. Instead, he goes for a more obtuse objection: what would be the benefit of doing something? Will it help you in Christ, or glorify sin?

That’s the argument I hope to make here, hoping to correct the opposite extreme of the first of three views on portrayals of evil. The first was a notion that Christians are commanded to think only about pleasant and Godly things and expose themselves to as few portrayals of evil as possible. But the second view goes something like this:

2. Because we’re saved, there’s nothing wrong with seeing the same movies, listening to the same music, reading the same books as others. After all, they’re just movies, music, books; I’m mature enough to handle these things. Besides, for much too long Christians have segregated themselves and been legalistic, and we’re supposed to be “all things to all people.” How should we evangelize if we don’t understand the culture we live in?




Shellacking ‘The Shack’ on doctrine and fiction, part I

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 04:15 PM ET , Tuesday, Jul 08, 2008

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Media: Books, Rebuttals, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Christian Novels, Cross Firings, Divergent Church



A rather pithy slogan has come to mind recently, which if I’m not careful I’ll likely end up using far too many times in multiple columns on this site and elsewhere. It’s based on the untrue notion that if Christians act loving toward others, then they’re not doctrinally solid — or, more commonly, if Christians advocate solid doctrine, then they’re automatically not loving.

Who, exactly, came up with this false dichotomy? We might guess one culprit: the Devil, who likes extreme positions to either end of a Biblical balance — a front-and-center focus on Christ and the Gospel. Yet human reasoning has a lot to do with it, too.

The slogan is this:

Christ-followers really can walk the walk and chew deep doctrine at the same time.

And I keep wanting to say this repeatedly while writing this series of mini-“essays,” mostly in the form of rebuttals, in response to two (and probably more) installments on the Boundless blog during the past week, about the quasi-Christian small novel The Shack. Blogger Tom Neven had written before about that Controversial book and followed it up with two posts on July 1 and July 3 (“controversial” in my view is often journalism-ese for “we shouldn’t have to talk about this thing because it’s really nothing new, but it’s somehow hugely popular, so I guess we’d better take a look at it”).

In those discussions I’ve contributed much, and much of that material is reproduced here, with slight adjustments for formatting and a too-late-for-the-original-page self-edit here and there.




Kicking around the Christian fiction roundhouse

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 11:59 AM ET , Thursday, Aug 16, 2007

Permalink
Categories: Media: Books, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels



Chuck Norris doesn't actually write books, the words assemble themselves out of fear.

-- “Chuck Norris Facts”

Perhaps that explains this?

About two days ago I saw this item in a Christian book catalog and was slightly stunned. After all, hardback copies of the first book in this series were once available by the dozens on the shelves at the Christian bookstore where I used to work, at about $24.95 apiece. After less-than-lackluster sales, the store finally shipped many of them back to the publisher as dead weight and sometime later received paperback reprints at about $10 apiece, which gained similar non-blockbuster status.

Perhaps the credits on the front, strongly implying the book was actually written by CHUCK NORRIS (!!!) but may actually be the combined products of the three-man committee whose members' names follow, had something to do with this?

Surely, Chuck Norris may be able to beat everyone at the computer game “Oregon Trail,” change the law of physics, bench-press the Earth, etc., but no one has time to do all that and become a real professional novelist.

Yet the mere strength of the name seems enough to warrant a sequel — albeit a $10 paperback first print — even to a first book that only got 10 reviews on Amazon, some negative, and the others positive mostly only because this was a Clean Old West Novel (as if no Christian writer ever thought of that idea before).

The publishing industry is indeed strange; the Christian publishing industry, even stranger.

Disclaimer: I realize that, especially as I have not actually read the book, I am supposedly risking horrible deaths by roundhouse kicks and possibly subsequent cannibalism by the inimitable Chuck Norris.

However, in my defense, I must reluctantly cite the karate fighter/actor's columns at the uberconservative WorldNetDaily cyber-newspaper — especially this one — as proof that the man is actually a rather gentle, overall harmless soul; and aside from the apparently poor forays into fiction “authoring,” thus far I have much admiration for his accomplishments and Christian faith.)




Christian fantasy — 'competing' with You Know Who?

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 11:43 AM ET , Friday, Jul 20, 2007

Permalink
Categories: Media: Books, Rebuttals, Politics: The Left Wing, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels, Subculture Shop



This Wednesday, author Wayne Thomas Batson, a co-blogger of mine at Speculative Faith, posted an update regarding the end of his tour with fellow fantasy authors Bryan Davis, Sharon Hinck and Christopher Hopper. Batson actually saved his most interesting news for last:

You might be looking at the calendar and thinking, “Oh, the Fantasy Fiction Tour Wayne is on is over.” Well, that's what I thought. God {who is in the habit of doing so} had other ideas.

The first thing is: on the FRONT page of Today's (Wednesday) Washington Post, there is an article about Christian Fantasy, focusing quite a bit on my work with The Door Within and Isle of Swords.
Here's the link if you'd like to read the article online:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/
article/2007/07/17/AR2007071702182.html


Then, my agent, Gregg Wooding, calls in the middle of our last Tour Signing at the Timeless Treasures Store in downtown Manhattan. “Wayne, you might want to sit down,” he says.

“I saw it, Gregg,” I say, misunderstanding him. “The Washington Post put the Christian Fantasy article on the front page—my book Isle of Swords, right there on the front page.”

He pauses, “Uh, yes, that was great, but there's more.”

Stunned silence.

“Fox News just called. They want you to stay in New York so that they can have you as a guest on Fox and Friends, Friday morning 6:45 am.”

More stunned silence, punctuated by rapid heart rate and shortness of breath.

This is real. God is making me into one of the small stones that starts an avalanche in the mountains. It's happening. Adventures are funny things...they may appear down a seldom trodden path or even arrive with...a phone call. But they always begin with the unexpected.

The interview time was later changed to 8:45 am EDT, more convenient for Americans with cable all across the fruited plain. Of course, I ensured to catch the show myself this morning. About half an hour later, I added this to Wayne’s Speculative Faith post:

Now the interview is complete, as of about half an hour ago. Much of it was spent with Wayne off to the left in his little Brady Bunch box whilst clips from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix played in the larger box to the right

I half-expected the “Fox and Friends” gang merely to ask him about whether he thought Ginny, Hagrid, Prof. McGonagall, et. al., would die in book seven, and whether Snape was good or bad or if Harry himself could be a Horcrux. And indeed much of the conversation did revolve around You Know Who (and I don't mean Voldemort).

However, Wayne gave a great answer regarding the Potter series, and expertly brought the focus back to his own work and the genre of Christ-honoring fantasy.

What I wish more people would realize — including the bulk of commentors at the Washington Post website — is that we're not all about “competition” for Harry Potter. This is patent nonsense; again, one would think with this constant comparison that Harry Potter emerged from a literary vacuum and set Christians a-scrambling to provide a Safe Alternative. Of course, while some Christians have indeed reacted in the tried-and-true anything-They-can-do,-we-can-do-too,-only-more-Spiritual! subculture approach, Wayne had the opportunity in his interview to make clear that his own series was started before Harry was a gleam in J.“K.” Rowling's eye; so was, for example, Dragons in Our Midst.

And why are these articles — including, I must reluctantly note, the otherwise-nice-enough Washington Post piece — not mentioned that Christian fantasy authors are merely following in the footsteps of the guys who started this genre in the middle of last century? One might as well say, then, that Rowling is “ripping off” Lewis's and Tolkien's ideas, or attempting to “compete” with Narnia and Lord of the Rings.

Well I say there's plenty of room on the bookshelf for all of them, though I definitely prefer specifically Christ-honoring and Christian worldview-containing fiction to secular stuff like Harry Potter.

Also, regarding all those Washington Post commentators who sneer out the canard, “The Bible itself is fairy tales! haw haw haw” — cackling to themselves at such cleverness — I must grin knowingly and nod assent. Yes, indeed, the Bible is full of “myths” — true myths, as the patron saints of modern fantasy literature, C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien, so wisely maintained.

And it is in their path they laid down that much of today's Christ-honoring fantasy/sci-fi authors follow — not that of Rowling. I can certainly hope that if/when media attention to Christian speculative literature increases, more writers and pundits will make note of the fact that Bible-Believing Christ-Followers Were Fantasy Authors First.

(Methinks I have a topic for my column next week. ...)




A Screwtape movie — Hell, yes?

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 10:51 AM ET , Sunday, Feb 18, 2007

Permalink
Categories: Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels, Media: Film and DVD, Books, Storytelling

The Screwtape Letters Recommended
The Screwtape Letters
by C. S. Lewis


Earlier this month, prolific NarniaWebber and news-breaker glumPuddle posted this on NarniaWeb's Word on the Street:

Walden to Adapt CS Lewis’ ’Screwtape Letters’ for Big Screen

Big news for CS Lewis fans! According to Variety, Ralph Winter (X-Men, Fantastic Four), Randy Argue, and Douglas Gresham (Lewis’ stepson) will produce a big screen adaptation of CS Lewis’ book “The Screwtape Letters” with Walden Media. The project is described as “a midbudget, primarily live-action pic” that “embodies Christian themes.” Walden hopes to release the film in 2008. First published in 1942, “The Screwtape Letters” is a collection of 31 letters from a retired demon name Screwtape to his nephew Wormwood on the best way to decieve humans. Read the full story here!

Now we have more from Ralph Winter in InfuzeMag, discussing X-Men, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer and other high-budget feature films; then he talks about Thr3e, House and other possible Peretti adaptations, and then his temptation to produce Screwtape.

What's happening with C.S. Lewis' The Screwtape Letters?

It's in development with Fox and Walden Media. Fox has owned the property for decades. They bought it in the 50s. There was management at Fox that wanted it and bought it, and they've owned it for decades.

So what's the current status?

We're signing deals right now. We're finishing the Fox option deal, we're finishing my deal with Walden. Doug Gresham's deal is done.

Does the movie have a green light?

Not yet. We've been talking to Randall Wallace about writing and directing. We need to have more discussions with Fox and Walden about that, and make sure that Randy's still available. Everybody wants to make this movie; I think it's going to happen, I just don't know what the timetable is right now.

We're very excited about that. With the right script, dealing with temptation and that whole upside down world, it could be a very, very interesting movie. And it's going to be dark. This isn't a light, happy, Narnia piece.

The C.S. Lewis name alone should be enough to draw people into the theaters.

We've been telling people that for years, and they wouldn't believe it. And now that Narnia has happened, they're a lot more open to it. (Laughs.)

My reaction to this is not as excited as I might have expected to have, say, five years ago. For instance, Frank Peretti's recent thriller novels, such as House and Monster, are fairly much only assembled prototype lower-budget movie screenplays in advance — a far cry from the two Darkness epics with which his career began.

Also, along with Screwtape, Ralph Winter wants to produce a film version of The Purpose-Driven Life. How exactly can one do that from a nonfiction “inspiration” book? Easily, by crafting a story about someone who goes through the program; an hour-and-a-half-long commercial would result, but Purpose and its merchandise and program spinoffs has already become such a parody of itself that one could hardly fail to expect a movie commercial version.

But the fact that Winter wants to give that book the same attention he gives a classic like Screwtape Letters — which, unlike PDL, actually has something original and thoroughly Biblical to say — leads to some reluctant skepticism on my part.

However, as I wrote on Feb. 9 in a resultant forum thread, I believe a film version of The Screwtape Letters, with its elements of fiction along with Deep And Sardonic Theological Magic, could be fantastic.

The film would be called The Screwtape Letters, to be sure, and quote the actual letters frequently, perhaps with Screwtape's voice-over as we watch Wormwood (CG demons, of course!) attempt to tempt the central human. He would have a name, along with Wormwood having a voice, neither one of which exist in the book).

The new storyline would be focused on this man becoming a Christian and going about his standard, day-to-day early-40s British activities without much fuss — while the demons correspond behind the scenes and we see just exactly how much effort they put into trying to deceive a Christian.

Can it be done without changing what we know of the man — let's call him William — from the Letters themselves? Absolutely. It's all there: his first impressions of the church, arguments with his mother, falling-in with the sort of family and especially the young lady whose nature makes Screwtape want to throw up (and then, in his anger, assume the form of a very large centipede). All of this would make a great story.

Artistic license is fully possible without ruining the book. After all, it's not like they can change William's name or job (we didn't know what either was from the Letters) or toss in a noncanonical romance (it was in the book) or make up a bunch of violence and conflict (World War II was in the book).

We could even have deviations into the bigger picture, in which Screwtape performs his own job, perhaps further down in Hell's lowerarchy. What does he do all day? besides write letters? We can find out. Perhaps involved with the war. Perhaps he's even helping Hitler's regime in Germany. But the fact that even while doing all of these “big” things, he takes such interest in a “junior tempter” like Wormwood and the latter's “minor” project, would show viewers that every human life is a focus of tremendous spiritual unheavel.

Now about Ralph Winter, I'm a tad underwhelmed. He seems to be the go-to guy so far for faith-based movies that don't have much depth to them -- at least so far.

I haven't yet seen Thr3e for example, which he produced, and I love the novel, but it's not a very deep and specifically Christian story. Meanwhile House, by Ted Dekker and Frank Peretti, was a slipshod construction, bringing all of the two authors' various quirks in one product but with very few of the benefits — and Winter is reflexively producing the “story,” such as it is. (The movie announcement was in the back of the book and his endorsement was on the front.)

However, with Douglas Gresham involved, things will surely go well. And because it's The Screwtape Letters, how could one make a shallow film? One would need to work as hard as possible to pull that off, much more labor than it would take to simply stay true to the in-depth original. ...

Yes, Gresham is involved, and in a recent interview he said something which I thought very nice, and which is even now gracing my signature image at NarniaWeb:






Nine Marks of Widescreen Stories, part 2: Staying off ‘the bench of bishops’

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 06:28 PM ET , Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels, Storytelling



(Originally posted Oct. 18, 2006, at Speculative Faith. Part 3 available now: Creating fantastic work that rivals the best of 'secular" stories.)



In late 2005, the Christian world, and especially its media, were in quite a bit of a frenzied excitement — a state almost unparalleled even by the excitement of The Passion of the Christ — because this time the children could go to the movie, too.

It was the Disney/Walden Media motion picture adaptation of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.

Christianity Today’s front-page article was titled C.S. Lewis: Superstar. Megachurch pastors in their glee assembled 10-part sermons about things like The Turkish Delight in Our Lives. Yes, the truths of sacrifice, redemption and good versus evil were on the big screen again: a Lord of the Rings redux, except more simple and direct. And with fantastic casting, sets and visual effects, it looked great.

Even better, the blockbuster film hid none of the Christ-honoring worldview elements embedded by the story’s author. Thousands more found wonder and enchantment in the world of Narnia — and fantasy fiction altogether, even that which honored the Biblical worldview, received another boost.

But then there were those Christians who became far too enthusiastic.




Nine Marks of Widescreen Stories, part 1: Building a foundational, permeating, Biblical worldview

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 07:56 PM ET , Wednesday, Oct 18, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels, Storytelling



(Originally posted Oct. 11, 2006 at Speculative Faith. Part 2 available now: Staying off 'the bench of bishops'.)



I’ve been writing for a while about this “genre” called Widescreen Fiction, a term that first originated in my Aug. 23, 2006 column Re-editing Christian Fiction for Widescreen Viewers.

Since then, that theme has continued in a further series — I’ve been trying to explain more about the Christian market’s stigmatizing of these story forms, where the stigma came from, what some writers are doing to overcome it, and what methods may work to broaden readers’ scope of preferences beyond the limited genres currently available in Christian fiction.

Widescreen fiction: a speculative story with realistic characters, epic elements and engaging plot that includes strong, Christ-honoring themes of good versus evil and growth in faith.

That’s the central definition, but perhaps now is a great time to assemble a longer list of what Widescreen Fiction entails. With apologies to Nine Marks Ministries (which presents its Nine Marks of a Healthy Church), here begins summaries of the Nine Marks of Widescreen Stories.


1. Building a foundational, permeating Biblical worldview

This is absolutely essential to the truly Christ-honoring work of widescreen fiction. Often some authors, in the hopes of crossover success, basic non-offensiveness, or sometimes unintentional style, have left out elements that distinguish their novels as those truly inspired by a love for Christ’s truths and a Christian worldview, and we want to avoid that.

Here things become slightly difficult to explain, for widescreen fiction (and any fiction) of course include fictitious worlds, not only reality-based but fantastic and foreign. In these stories, one can’t always include the specific God, Christ, holy Bible, conversions to the faith and such.

Yet those concepts can either be strongly hinted toward, or told in the form of allegory or analogy.

However, the latter option seems to me overused, as many novels and stories have already mimicked the style of allegorical elements in The Chronicles of Narnia, or else included direct, sometimes shallow analogies to God and salvation.

J.R.R. Tolkien, to be sure, was among the best authors who wrote from a Christian worldview but only hinted toward it; he incidentally split the characteristics of Christ between Gandalf, Aragorn and Frodo, and generalized the struggle between good and evil in the conflict to destroy the One Ring and overt the Dark Lord’s domination. One can even find Christian worldviews evident in the stories of the superhero films Spider-Man, Batman Begins and Superman Returns.

Certainly the specific spiritual themes will vary between novels, as the author discovers them naturally while focusing on the story.

But some elements, I believe, are crucial to include in any widescreen-format, speculative story, primarily the core truths of the Gospel: Law and Grace.

Law — that is, objective moral standards — are easy to include in the story, but fortunately for all of us, the message of Christ doesn’t end with the Law (otherwise, we would all be dead).

Thus, Grace and redemption are just as essential to include, and will also likely imbed themselves in the characters and storyline while the Christ-following writer isn’t even trying to do that.

However, many Christian books I’ve read don’t go much beyond the common themes of God Loves You Even in Times of Trouble and Loneliness, or Take That Leap of Faith: themes that are often geared toward the unsaved, focusing on the main character’s Journey to Faith.

This seems strange, not only because, as with analogies, those themes are somewhat overdone, but because most Christian readers already know about those messages anyway. Certainly we shouldn’t do away with those truths, but why not attempt going beyond them? As authors mature in their craft, so they can grow in their story complexities and imbue deeper themes. Meanwhile, their readers just might grow right along with them.

I’ll argue in part 4 that either hints, or even overt inclusions, of Biblical elements such as church attendance, evangelism and dealing with false Christians can also be included in widescreen fiction; and part 7 deals exclusively with the need for the Church’s representation in Christian stories.

Yet the next installment, part 2, concerns the opposite extreme to weakening a novel’s Christian worldview: the tactic of strengthening the Christian messages too much. Dozens of novels fall into this trap (with or without “authorship” attributed to some big-name preacher); they make it clear that their writers’ intent is to propagandize readers rather than tell them a story.

And what results are “stories,” such as they are, revolving around myopic messages and devoid of thematic layers. They will likely put off non-Christian readers; and either bore, or fail to engage fully, readers who are already Christians.

So keep your gazed fixed on this screen — and it’s all in widescreen format, of course. …



Widescreen Fiction series on Speculative Faith

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 12:10 PM ET , Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Storytelling, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels



The first of a nine-part series on Forming Widescreen Fiction is up at Speculative Faith.

For a few months now I’ve been keeping up with Speculative Faith, quite overjoyed at the number of sci-fi and fantasy authors who’ve found a cyber-gathering place like this.

Now it’s my privilege to start contributing headliner installments of my own. Many of you I’ve met at ACFW 2006 in Dallas; many of you I’ve yet to meet personally or even online. But already I can discern “kindred spirits” floating about this fantastic realm. And now I can enter this world myself. …

I’ve been writing for a while about this “genre” called Widescreen Fiction, a term that first originated in my Aug. 23, 2006 column Re-editing Christian Fiction for Widescreen Viewers.

Since then, that theme has continued in a further series — I’ve been trying to explain more about the Christian market’s stigmatizing of these story forms, where the stigma came from, what some writers are doing to overcome it, and what methods may work to broaden readers’ scope of preferences beyond the limited genres currently available in Christian fiction.

Widescreen fiction: a speculative story with realistic characters, epic elements and engaging plot that includes strong, Christ-honoring themes of good versus evil and growth in faith.

That’s the central definition, but perhaps now is a great time to assemble a longer list of what Widescreen Fiction entails. With apologies to Nine Marks Ministries (which presents its Nine Marks of a Healthy Church), here begins summaries of the Nine Marks of Widescreen Stories.


Read more at Nine Marks of Widescreen Stories: part 1.



Forming Widescreen Fiction, part 1: Seeing past Christian story stigmatisms

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 12:00 AM ET , Saturday, Sep 30, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Media: Books, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels, Subculture Shop, Storytelling



It’s just slightly difficult to be a neo-sci-fi guy at the American Christian Fiction Writers 2006 conference last weekend in Dallas, Texas.

Actually, it’s even more difficult to be a guy altogether, at the American Christian Fiction Writers 2006 conference.


Intro: An ACFW Aftermath

Some estimated the conference’s attendance at about 95 percent women. I think that’s about right, so long as one doesn’t count the hotel bellhops and the concierge. Also, leave out the imaginary males who probably inhabit most of those writing women’s fiction works, whether published or not. Those males, of course, are quite dashing and handsome and just the sort of chaps who can ease the loneliness filling women’s hearts on the barren prairie.

Ah, but this is facetious. Not all the novelists, male or female, were purveyors of the Prairie Romance. Some were purveyors of cozy romance, inspirational romance, Scottish/Irish romance, World War II-era romance, romantic comedy, romantic suspense, chick lit romance, contemporary romance …

Here I even more speak the truth: after the first day, they doubled the first-floor restroom space for women, giving them the men's restroom too, which of course resulted in a 100 percent cut in facilities for the males in attendance. I, as a male, adapted well; others were more annoyed, including author Randall Ingermanson (City of God series, Oxygen, The Fifth Man) who I heard secondhand was tempted to go in there nonetheless.

However, another rumor held that most women, understandably, didn’t want to go in the men’s room anyway. I would think half of the implements therein would likely be useless to the women no matter what — and that’s all I have to say about that.

Well, I suppose it hasn’t been too long since the organization changed its named from American Christian Romance Writers. Inevitably there would be a lag time.


Vital storytelling statistics

Readership in the Christian Booksellers’ Association (CBA), the catch-all term for Christian publishing, is just a little more balanced: most put it at 80-20, still slanted toward women. Secular publishers have about the same ratio, though, so this isn’t unique to Christendom.

Guys read more nonfiction, one of the conference’s organizers told me. Fine, that is sensible, I say, but that still fails to explain the smashing success of the nonfiction (ahem) author and decidedly-non-Alpha-Male-ish Joel Osteen.

With this general market from which to draw, it’s understandable that Romance and all its related modifiers would prove the more popular genres. Behind the counters of a Christian bookstore myself, I have seen these customers: they are mostly middle-aged and older women, and often members of a certain denomination (Southern Baptist) who much enjoy this sort of thing in their reading material.

So, one really can’t “blame” the publishers for frowning upon alternative genres, such as the neo-sci-fi story I advocate and the fantasy / sci-fi hybrids underway by many other Christ-honoring writers.

After all, that sort of thing just won’t sell, claimed one editor during the publisher’s panel the first afternoon. And after a sneaked-in question (another ahem) about whether the hugely increased popularity of Tolkien and Lewis was affecting the CBA’s offerings at all, David Long, editor from Bethany House and Faith*in*Fiction blogger, was quite direct: “No” — instantly prompting raised imaginary phasers and magical battle staffs from the outraged fantasy / sci-fi warriors.

Ergo, sci-fi and fantasy are genres with a stigma — their own sub-stigma within a “niche market” that itself has long been stigmatized in the publishing world.

Yet Lord willing, both of those stigmas may be changing.


Breaking through former genre border patrols

Friday afternoon’s class-type session with Tyndale House Publishers editor Karen Watson proved to be among the most intriguing. Substituting for the session's original speaker, she explained all about the CBA’s origins story — and what turned out to be an in-depth question-and-answer session carried the topic even further.

Where would the CBA go from here, some asked, especially now that more secular publishers are buying up Christian publishers?

Watson’s answer was encouraging. The big guys will know not to mess with a good thing, she told her audience. They know it’s the content of the novels that helps them sell, not merely the adjective label of Christian on their covers or their places on Christian bookstore shelves. Water down their messages too much, and genre readers will — or should — complain mightily.

Besides, one woman in the audience added, we already have “Christian” books whose themes are far less Christian than one would expect, and secular publishers had nothing to do with that.

The whole idea of “Christian” as adjective is either far overdone or else underdone. Books with incredible Christ-honoring and Biblical-worldview themes — The Chronicles of Narnia, of course, The Lord of the Rings and countless novels among the classics — contain far deeper messages about Christ and His truths than many new “Christian” books out there. That would of course include whatever Christian-in-name-only book the above-described woman mentioned reading, whose author, she said, basically added going to church in the story’s middle as a subplot device and that was it for religion.

A truly Christian book could of course be contemporary/chick-lit/cozy romance or whatever; few would get rid of those genres even if that were possible. They will always have an audience. And I’m sure multiple authors are capable of embedding deeper themes about the Christian’s journey of faith in their stories.

But it’s long past time to de-stigmatize what I call Widescreen Fiction — that is, stories with epic themes, good versus evil and growth in the Christ-following life. This story category can encompass science fiction, or “futuristic drama/thriller,” as I term the story I’m writing. This can encompass fantasy. And this has already encompassed outright thrillers, supernatural and otherwise, such as the groundbreaking works of Frank Peretti, Ted Dekker, and even those ubiquitous novels by those Left Behind guys.


A fantastic future for widescreen formats?

Still, at present, most fantasy / sci-fi, despite their genres’ overwhelming popularity in the secular realms, remain stigmatized in the CBA.

“Yet hope remains, if company is true.”

Those big publishing houses buying up the Christian ones surely won’t maintain a total hands-off policy. Perhaps some compromises in message will be made in some ways, but again, it’s not like a softened-doctrine problem would be brand-new for Christian publishing. More likely, I submit these new arrangements and attitudes could just result in the further hybridization of markets, and more chances for “crossover” novels, perhaps mostly for authors who don’t write solely to drive their main “characters,” and by proxy their non-Christian readers, to Salvation.

Thus, Christian publishing just may become less-stigmatized. As the market becomes broader, as competition increases, that just may drive authors toward developing better and more in-depth stories in all genres. And as the former book borders are broken through just a little — science fiction and fantasy may at last become de-stigmatized as well.

It may take even a generation of work, perhaps working to undo the vast errors of previous eras of Christendom — a theory I’m working on now, and will begin outlining in the next installment of this new Forming Widescreen Fiction series.

Until then, I will begin extending this offer to any C/I/S/I/WW2/C/S/CL/C romance readers (or writers) I meet, either coming into the Christian bookstore, or widely available at the American Christian Fiction Writers 2007 conference (hosted by author James Scott Bell, who, I hear tell, is male). My offer will be phrased something like this:

“I’ll read your C/I/S/I/WW2/C/S/CL/C romance novel if you’ll read my widescreen sci-fi/fantasy novel.”

You never know — someday they’ll finally give in.

And perhaps in another generation those blesed older women will be coming into the bookstores, perhaps in Starfleet uniforms, and snapping up the latest in a Christian seven-volume series with dragons and fair maidens and battle staff flashes and things like that, all over the covers. Then an underground coalition of disenfranchised Prairie Romance writers can form and begin pushing for publishers to favor their long-neglected genre, and the Great Circle of Life can continue.

Or perhaps we can mostly follow the standard set by the Master Author in His original Novel — which, I may hasten to add, is only available in Widescreen format.



Stephen Lawhead: expanding fiction frontiers

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 12:32 PM ET , Thursday, Sep 28, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Media: Books, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels



Writer Both Goddard has published part 1 of her exclusive interview with author Stephen Lawhead, whose recent release Hood and other novels have been published — and some republished! — by Thomas Nelson's Westbow imprint.

Lawhead, like some other Christ-honoring writers whose numbers are growing, is clear that he's not out to Push A Message. His ideas begin with images, like his genre predecessor C.S. Lewis. Any worldview tenets flow naturally from that basis, and not that of Message Pushing.

I'm not trying to impose anything on anyone; that is, I’m not writing propaganda. On the other hand, it’s my book, so it’s going to come from my point of view. Like any writer, I naturally take up what I know or what I’m interested in. In Hood, for example, I liked exploring the distinction between these highly organised, politicised, corporate-type Norman priests ... and the more disorganized, unsophisticated but often more spiritual Celtic clerics.




Re-editing Christ-centered fiction for widescreen viewers

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 01:32 PM ET , Wednesday, Aug 23, 2006

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Media: Books, Deep Doctrine Magic: Christian Novels, Subculture Shop, Storytelling



This column had been modified from its original version. It has been formatted to fit your possible viewpoint.



If you haven’t been into a Christian bookstore in a while, take a moment to slip past the little yes,-add-me-to-your-church-mailing-list bulk bulletin cards, giant VeggieTales displays for their recent pop-culture-friendly DVD releases, and wooden Willow Tree figurines shaped like gentle women without faces.

Instead, browse the fiction section for a while. Note the covers — many of them featuring women, often in calico dresses, standing on the prairie, looking forlorn. Then choose from among this “variety” of volumes and note the back cover descriptions.

Or, perhaps I can save you some time here, by utilizing intensive market research and thus hybridizing all of them into a complete summary of summaries, like this:

It’s the year 1878! Sierra Samantha Victoria Hutchinson Dick Cheney O’Regan Begorrah Lancaster is a (select one: frontier doctor/lawyer/U.S. Marshal, daughter of Irish immigrants, abandoned orphan, child of stern Amish upbringing), who is (select one: trying to make her way in a career dominated by men, struggling to understand a new land and find true love, struggling with her own loneliness brought on by the man who left her behind, trying to reconcile her faith and childhood abuses).

Will her faith in God be put to the Ultimate Test?! Maybe!

These and other scintillating questions will be answered herein and also in the forthcoming next eight books in this series, available next month — same Bat-time, same Bat-channel! Same peril! . . .

And so it goes.

I have neither personal irritation with these books, nor for the authors who write them. After all, I’ve never actually read one all the way through. Books like these sell big; from behind the bookstore counters, I’ve seen them fly off the shelves — not literally, of course, but literarily. The very-imitable, yet prolific, Beverly Lewis, Judith Pella, Francine Rivers, seemingly multiple generations of Gilbert Morrises and of course Karen Kingsbury, and all their literary cousins, move major metal in the marketplace.

Readers — invariably, middle-aged and elderly church-intensive women — just can’t get enough of them.

Romance is a particular element of such ultra-similar stories. Even entire series, based on geographical landmarks, promise heartwarming accounts of Love, True Love and Marriage in such exotic locales as Hawaii, San Francisco, Florida, yes, even Kansas and Kentucky. Character names and locations only are changed to protect the innocent.

And innocent they are. As one woman told me, such books provide wholesome alternatives to those steamy romance writings available on the secular shelves. Yet the cleaned-up books are somewhat unrealistic, she added, laughing with me about the “state” of the geographic series’ titles.

“The male characters are always compassionate and Christlike, and seem to know exactly what to say to win the ladies’ hearts,” she admitted with a grin.

Yet she purchases and reads them anyway — as do many of her friends. And within, many rough edges to the sides of this narrow view of life have been safely edited away. It’s far unlike real life, and far apart from what the Creator expects from His redeemed in a world of rebellion and discomfort.