home | archives: August 2008

Welcome

FaithFusion offers blogs and columns on many topics: storytelling, society and culture, philosophy, religion, politics, science, and especially “deep doctrine magic” about all seven.

 

Features

 



Tags

 

Archives

 



 

Search

 



Updates



Follow me on Twitter
 



Recently read:
Nonfiction















 


Recently read:
Fiction







 



The obscurity of ‘purity’ and Christ-honoring art, part I

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 04:59 PM ET , Thursday, Aug 28, 2008

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Media: Film and DVD, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Life Applications



(Columnist's note: the following essay, the first of three planned parts, was simulposted to Speculative Faith.)

For this week’s column, I’m going to do something many Christian columnists do, but that (from what I remember) I haven’t yet done: quote a Bible passage, and thus sound very profound. In this case, it’s a passage that is so often misunderstood — and even less often, that misunderstanding is not contrasted with the life and practice of the apostle who wrote it.

Here goes:

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.

Philippians 4:8 (ESV)

This verse came to mind while I was still making a few incidental rounds online, reading a few blogs on which Christian commentators were critiquing The Dark Knight. Already I’ve offered my views, on this site and elsewhere; and as much as I did appreciate the blockbuster Batman film, somehow I’d like to move on and talk about something else. However, the film and its indeed “dark” elements have engendered a variety of reactions within Christendom. And I can’t help but think Christians’ views of the Gospel of grace — whether right or wrong — are affecting how they see stories like this.

I hope some of you won’t be too annoyed here, because in this and in at least two future columns, I hope to categorize those factions and reactions to this film, and novels and films altogether, into three groups. Then I’ll deal with them one by one, ending with the view held by me and many others.


Virtue versus violence

1. Christians shouldn’t expose themselves to negative things no matter how positive other elements are. Darkness can’t mix with light. To do so would be to compromise, expose ourselves to evil and maybe allow Satan to gain a foothold in our lives.

Those who hold this view — or a derivative; my summary can only go so far — would point to the Philippians passage as proof that Christians should avoid thinking much about evil, looking at images of evil or contemplating the reality of evil. Instead, we’re supposed to concentrate on only the good stuff, and thus, only good guys in our stories.

I hope most Christians don’t have the extreme perspective given, purely by accident, by a character in the “Kids Praise” cassettes of the ‘80s and early ‘90s, featuring Psalty the Singing Songbook. In one of the later tapes, Charity Churchmouse, trying to encourage Psalty’s omnipresent cabal of kids not to get depressed and down, sings the words of Philippians 4:8, along with her interpretation (you wild-at-heart guys, please hang tough through this): “I think about bright yellow daisies and daffodils, petunias, and all kinds of posies!” she proclaims. That’s just reading a silly, false and overly feminized view into the verse, though I’m sure that wasn’t Psalty’s intent.

Even the milder form of such a view would seem based on the incidental perception that Philippians 4:8 has a single word in there, which it does not — the word only. If such a meaning of the total-virtue types were true, it seems the apostle Paul would have put in the term between the words think and about — i.e., “think only about these things.” But he didn’t. Everything in this chapter is for encouragement, not a do-this-only command.




More on darkness, light and ‘The Dark Knight’

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 04:37 PM ET , Monday, Aug 11, 2008

Permalink
Categories: Columns, Media: Film and DVD, Rebuttals, Deep Doctrine Magic: Biblical Theology, Cross Firings



One week shy of a month since its release, The Dark Knight is still bringing in the numbers. According to Box Office Mojo as of yesterday, its total ticket sales in the U.S. are $441.5 million; and that, joined with $263.5 million in international earnings, brings in a global profit of almost $705 million. The film is also still at no. 1, after nearly a month of being released, and it's still stomping newer movies, including Mummy 3 or whatever.

But though many Christ-followers are seeing the film too, and are gripped by it and its dark yet ultimately redemptive message, several see the film as much darker than that — perhaps irredeemably dark.

One such critic, author Bryan Davis, has written several books, including the fantasy Dragons in Our Midst series. And he already had some unorthodox ideas about life, Christianity and everything, anyway. That includes un-Biblical and neo-Pelagian views on human nature without Christ, going so far on his blog (though not in his books; the ones that I've read, anyway) to claim that humankind is not basically sinful — or that the fact that Christians can and still sin, even if they are taking sanctification seriously, is simply untrue.

I've enjoyed some of Bryan's books, and have interacted with him on occasion, most recently here, regarding the very same issue of neo-Pelagianism. However, it's clear he holds to the basic Gospel, in which case, as I also noted, we're definitely colleagues in Christ.

But again, we'll likely need to agree to disagree, after the review of The Dark Knight that he posted Saturday. Along with picking on a few potential plot holes and why-didn't-the-ferry-passengers-just-try-to-disable-the-bomb kinds of questions (um, yeah), he repeats oft-occuring criticisms in Christendom of the film's climax.

'Ware spoilers:

When Dent dies, Batman and Gordon try to cover up this madman by lying about who killed the five police officers whom Dent had killed. Batman and Gordon agreed to say that Batman did it.

What? Are you kidding? Save the reputation of the psychopath and destroy the reputation of the true hero? For what reason? So the Joker wouldn't “win.” Lie to honor the dead false hero, who can't help you anymore, and destroy the true hero who can help? That's absurd. It's stupid. It's wrong.






‘Jesus’ fake, drug take and stolen steak

Avatar by Dr Ransom at 01:36 PM ET , Tuesday, Aug 05, 2008

Permalink
Categories: Local News



As I’ve said a few times before in this category, local police reports containing such material as the excerpts below seem even funnier, given the (oft-misspelling-riddled) just-the-facts style in which they’re written.

Surely the officers, though, late at night, can see the humor in the situation, and perhaps even the humorless style into which their descriptions must be compressed. And, of course, perhaps with that in mind, the below excerpts only seem more comical to me, when in the course of my day job I’m finding them hidden in the otherwise dull and routine reports …

(Also, note the insistence of local law enforcement to term a car smashing into a stationary object a “collision,” despite the insistence of snide grammarians and journalism professors nationwide that a real “collision” requires the simultaneous impact of two objects in actual motion.)




The last temptation of ‘Christ’

On July 18, 2008 at 1734HRS I responded to a fight in progress [. . .]

Upon my arrival the Accused, Jesus Hernandez was being held down by a bystander in the roadway [. . .] I separated the subjects and through my investigation, it was discovered that Jesus arrived at the apartment around 10 minutes prior to my arrival. Witnesses on the scene stated that Jesus was trying to fight subjects at the residence and ended up hitting one subject, Ismael Quintero several times. It was then stated that Ismael was able to detain Jesus, prior to my arrival. I arrested Jesus for Disorderly Conduct 2nd Degree for engaging in fighting, violent behavior and causing a panic for the people outside in that area.