FaithFusion offers blogs and columns on
many topics: storytelling, society and culture, philosophy, religion,
politics, science, and especially “deep doctrine magic” about
all seven.
A church whose sign work has already found its way into this blog's little “Signs and Countersigns” series has another one up, just in time for a pithy rebuttal.
Earlier this month, prolific NarniaWebber and news-breaker glumPuddle posted this on NarniaWeb's Word on the Street:
Walden to Adapt CS Lewis’ ’Screwtape Letters’ for Big Screen
Big news for CS Lewis fans! According to Variety,
Ralph Winter (X-Men, Fantastic Four), Randy Argue, and Douglas Gresham
(Lewis’ stepson) will produce a big screen adaptation of CS Lewis’ book
“The Screwtape Letters” with Walden Media. The project is described as
“a midbudget, primarily live-action pic” that “embodies Christian
themes.” Walden hopes to release the film in 2008. First published in
1942, “The Screwtape Letters” is a collection of 31 letters from a
retired demon name Screwtape to his nephew Wormwood on the best way to
decieve humans. Read the full story here!
Now we have more from Ralph Winter in InfuzeMag, discussing X-Men, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer and other high-budget feature films; then he talks about Thr3e, House and other possible Peretti adaptations, and then his temptation to produce Screwtape.
What's happening with C.S. Lewis' The Screwtape Letters?
It's
in development with Fox and Walden Media. Fox has owned the property
for decades. They bought it in the 50s. There was management at Fox
that wanted it and bought it, and they've owned it for decades.
So what's the current status?
We're signing deals right now. We're finishing the Fox option deal,
we're finishing my deal with Walden. Doug Gresham's deal is done.
Does the movie have a green light?
Not yet. We've been talking to Randall Wallace about writing and
directing. We need to have more discussions with Fox and Walden about
that, and make sure that Randy's still available. Everybody wants to
make this movie; I think it's going to happen, I just don't know what
the timetable is right now.
We're very excited about that. With the right script, dealing with
temptation and that whole upside down world, it could be a very, very interesting movie. And it's going to be dark. This isn't a light, happy, Narnia piece.
The C.S. Lewis name alone should be enough to draw people into the theaters.
We've been telling people that for years, and they wouldn't believe it. And now that Narnia has happened, they're a lot more open to it. (Laughs.)
My reaction to this is not as excited
as I might have expected to have, say, five years ago. For instance,
Frank Peretti's recent thriller novels, such as House and Monster, are fairly much only assembled prototype lower-budget movie screenplays in advance — a far cry from the two Darkness epics with which his career began.
Also, along with Screwtape, Ralph Winter wants to produce a film version of The Purpose-Driven Life.
How exactly can one do that from a nonfiction “inspiration” book?
Easily, by crafting a story about someone who goes through the program;
an hour-and-a-half-long commercial would result, but Purpose
and its merchandise and program spinoffs has already become such a
parody of itself that one could hardly fail to expect a movie
commercial version.
But the fact that Winter wants to give that book
the same attention he gives a classic like Screwtape Letters — which, unlike PDL, actually has something original and thoroughly Biblical to say — leads to some reluctant skepticism on my part.
However, as I wrote on Feb. 9 in a resultant forum thread, I believe a film version of The Screwtape Letters, with its elements of fiction along with Deep And Sardonic Theological Magic, could be fantastic.
The film would be called The Screwtape Letters,
to be sure, and quote the actual letters frequently, perhaps with
Screwtape's voice-over as we watch Wormwood (CG demons, of course!)
attempt to tempt the central human. He would have a name, along with
Wormwood having a voice, neither one of which exist in the book).
The
new storyline would be focused on this man becoming a Christian and
going about his standard, day-to-day early-40s British activities
without much fuss — while the demons correspond behind the scenes and
we see just exactly how much effort they put into trying to deceive a
Christian.
Can it be done without changing what we know of the
man — let's call him William — from the Letters themselves?
Absolutely. It's all there: his first impressions of the church,
arguments with his mother, falling-in with the sort of family and especially
the young lady whose nature makes Screwtape want to throw up (and then,
in his anger, assume the form of a very large centipede). All of this
would make a great story.
Artistic
license is fully possible without ruining the book. After all, it's not
like they can change William's name or job (we didn't know what either
was from the Letters) or toss
in a noncanonical romance (it was in the book) or make up a bunch of
violence and conflict (World War II was in the book).
We could even have deviations into the bigger picture, in which Screwtape performs his own job, perhaps further down in Hell's lowerarchy.
What does he do all day? besides write letters? We can find out.
Perhaps involved with the war. Perhaps he's even helping Hitler's
regime in Germany. But the fact that even while doing all of these
“big” things, he takes such interest in a “junior tempter” like
Wormwood and the latter's “minor” project, would show viewers that
every human life is a focus of tremendous spiritual unheavel.
Now
about Ralph Winter, I'm a tad underwhelmed. He seems to be the go-to
guy so far for faith-based movies that don't have much depth to them --
at least so far.
I haven't yet seen Thr3e for example, which he produced, and I love the novel, but it's not a very deep and specifically Christian story. Meanwhile House,
by Ted Dekker and Frank Peretti, was a slipshod construction, bringing
all of the two authors' various quirks in one product but with very few
of the benefits — and Winter is reflexively producing the “story,”
such as it is. (The movie announcement was in the back of the book and
his endorsement was on the front.)
However, with Douglas Gresham involved, things will surely go well. And because it's The Screwtape Letters, how could one make a shallow film? One would need to work as hard as possible to pull that off, much more labor than it would take to simply stay true to the in-depth original. ...
Yes, Gresham is involved, and in a recent interview he said something which I thought very nice, and which is even now gracing my signature image at NarniaWeb:
The ongoing discussion On Christianity, in NarniaWeb’s Spare Oom forum, has led to a focus on the location where Christ-followers will be spending much more time than they will on this Earth.
I’ve posted many excerpts from Randy Alcorn’s Heaven — a fantastic work of nonfiction, readable and yet in-depth — along with many of my own suppositions and speculations about Heaven. As I’ve said before, when you clear away all the myth-conceptions (among them the idea that “we can’t even begin to imagine what Heaven will be like,” based on a misreading of 1 Corinthians 2:9), all kinds of possibilities open up.
More recently, though, a subtopic appeared in real life, when yesterday, the pastor of the small startup church I’ve been attending, preached on 1 Corinthians 3: 10-15.
That’s the passage that is about How We Should Work For Heavenly Rewards. Or is it? I’m not sure exactly, and I’ll explain why in a moment.
His message contained pretty much the basic idea of Heavenly Rewards, which goes something like this:
1. Yes, salvation is absolutely free, through Grace.
2. We can do nothing to earn Christ’s instant justification, or the Spirit’s progressive sanctification.
3. However, Heavenly rewards are based on works.
4. More works = more rewards. Good.
5. Sit around, with fewer works = less rewards. Not so good.
6. Might want to get to work, then.
It all sounds somewhat — non-Reformed to me. Basically it’s identical to a works-based view of not salvation, but sanctification.
Of course, we are to “work out our own salvation” as James (I think) says, but one must be careful not to swerve to either extreme: thinking that either sanctification is all up to God or it’s all up to the Christian.
Legalism isn’t only defined by works = salvation, it can also be grace = salvation, but salvation + works = even better salvation. The latter is far more insidious.
Won’t this understanding of Eternal Rewards lead to the idea that more works will lead to better salvation? and that while Eternal Rewards may result, that may also mean you could consider yourself spiritually better than those Christians who don’t or won’t do as many works?
Firstly, I’m not all that convinced that is the full context of the passage. Paul is talking about his laying down the foundation for the church in that chapter. Ergo, the meaning of “if anyone builds on the foundation” may not only refer to specific believers and their good works as the foundation, but the building construction of the church collectively.
Now, I don’t wish to commit the sin of eisegesis, reading my own perspectives into the text. Because a plain reading of the text might seem to indicate the existence of Heavenly Rewards.
However, it still sounds quite works-based! — that of course, imputed righteousness may be a Christian’s automatic salary, but God pays extra commission for good works.
The pastor went so far as to say that if we show up in Heaven with less works, we’ll be quite disappointed.
This I find quite extra-Biblical — if not un-Biblical entirely. Does that mean that Jim Elliot, murdered by Aucan South Americans, would somehow be “superior” in Heaven and feel quite satisfied with his Earthly accomplishments and consequential rewards, while Joe Schmoe, the wrecked trucker who “prays the prayer” right before his head went through the windshield, would show up and be tearful because — well, because what? Because he didn’t do enough “works” to merit rewards?
No. I submit that even if you have less “rewards” or works-commission in Heaven, you’ll be quite fine with that. If God truly is sovereign, who is to blame if you’re Joe Schmoe and show up in Heaven minutes after the trucking accident without much to show for a long Christian life? It is God who decided the moment of salvation — Joe’s late arrival in the Kingdom would thus be God’s “fault.”
So, methinks that despite Joe’s lack of works-commission, he’ll be quite happy to be in the intermediate Heaven and perfectly fine with any role God will have planned for him in the future New Earth.
Clearly, Heaven — the future New Heaven, when it’s merged with the New Earth — will contain a hierarchy of sorts. The apostles will play key roles, as will the Old Testament “saints” including Abraham, Moses, King David and so on. Your standard believers will have different roles to play, perhaps “subordinate” within some kind of government and variable stewardships. As with a marriage, of course, and with the two Persons of the Trinity Themselves, “subordinate” doesn’t mean “inferior,” just a different role.
So though everyone in Heaven is “created equal,” people will have different roles to play. Do they “rotate” stewardships? Or work their way up some spiritual “corporate ladder”? We don’t know. But as far as I’ve seen, nowhere in Scripture are we given the idea that people will show up in Heaven disappointed about what they’ve found there.